It's a fair question, but I would submit that privacy of American ciitzens isn't a partisan issue. A surveilance state does not care if you are blue or red. Hearings aren't just a fix but also a mechanism to render transparency and thus hopefully avoid the cat from slipping the bag--again.
Ryan, you wrote the piece underneath my piece. I tracked the consumer scoreboard. You tracked the architecture. Together they tell the complete story: the people revolted against what they could see, while the capture you're describing was already complete behind the air gap.
The most chilling line: "The air gap that protects classified networks from external intrusion also protects them from the ethical commitments of the people who built the tools operating inside them."
That sentence belongs in every civics classroom in America.
Given the composition of Congress, why are hearings part of your suggested fix?
It's a fair question, but I would submit that privacy of American ciitzens isn't a partisan issue. A surveilance state does not care if you are blue or red. Hearings aren't just a fix but also a mechanism to render transparency and thus hopefully avoid the cat from slipping the bag--again.
Ryan, you wrote the piece underneath my piece. I tracked the consumer scoreboard. You tracked the architecture. Together they tell the complete story: the people revolted against what they could see, while the capture you're describing was already complete behind the air gap.
The most chilling line: "The air gap that protects classified networks from external intrusion also protects them from the ethical commitments of the people who built the tools operating inside them."
That sentence belongs in every civics classroom in America.
Full consumer revolt breakdown: tmaark.substack.com/p/hhhooollleee-sht